Aja Beech

  • Home
  • Poems
  • Short Stories
  • Journalism and Commentary
  • About
  • Poem + Meditation
  • Order

  • The Babylon Cartel

    This article first appeared March 13, 3013 at THE HUFFINGTON POST ARTS 

    Convenience Store by Aaron Ramey
    Convenience Store by Aaron Ramey
    Model wears the camouflage jacket by Gianni Lee
    Model wears the camouflage jacket by Gianni Lee
    Shirt making at Babylon Cartel Loft by Aaron Ramey
    Shirt making at Babylon Cartel Loft by Aaron Ramey

     

    Babylon Cartel brought Trinidad James to the Theatre of Living Arts in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, less than a week after a fatal shooting following a French Montana show at the same venue. Fashion designer Gianni Lee was a DJ for the evening. After the show, Lee invited me backstage to talk about his collective, his theories on art, design and being a young black man in today’s art world.

    “People see the color of my skin and they hear ‘artist’ they think ‘rapper, DJ’ but not in the way it is. They don’t think I was educated in Art,” says Lee, who created Babylon Cartel in 2006, along with Mark Wrice and Aaron Ramey. The Cartel is a collective of artists, graphic designers, and musicians, much like Andy Warhol’s Factory.

    Just about anyone is welcome to stop by the new Babylon Cartel loft in Los Angeles and inspire, or be inspired. Lee describes it as a place to “get away from the stigma” of violence and oppression surrounding artists of color.

    Within Babylon Cartel, the collective shares responsibilities, where different people take different leads on projects. They make an effort to attach ‘something profound’ to all of their work, from the flyers to the Trinidad James show highlighting the rapper’s layers of gold capped teeth to the fashion line with religious and social symbolism.

    Lee explains that one shirt they created with a likeness of President Barack Obama was met with confusion because of the Japanese writing that accompanied the image.

    “For us, what that represented was Obama ascended. The language didn’t matter; it was internationally recognizable even if you couldn’t read it.” These concepts come from life experience, and are why Babylon Cartel focuses so much energy on working and creating collectively, making each participant a kind of “human canvas,” their art is being.
    Lee grew up in a neighborhood called West Philadelphia, and considers the interactions he had as a child as fundamental to developing the artist he has become. The sense of community and his mother’s encouragement of his artistic talents pushed him and kept his influences diverse. “Crazy shit happened,” Lee reflects “but we were family.”

    After attending the Charter High School for Architecture and Design, Lee attended Temple University in Philadelphia, where he majored in Communications. “I wasn’t into that whole starving artist thing.” He admits of his motivation to not pursue his degree in visual arts. Lee pursued much of his design education in his spare time, reading about the history of the House of Chanel, learning about Japanese DJ and designer Nigo, studying the work of Frida Khalo and Jean-Michel Basquiat. Always with him though, his love of art and his optimism for what art can do to transform groups as well as individuals.

    Babylon Cartel’s Spring / Summer 2013 seems to be inspired by the collective’s recent expansion from Philadelphia to Los Angeles, as the styles are very inspired by varied international cultures. Lee maintains a focus on simplicity and an ability to make something visually or audibly beautiful from nearly anything. Lee’s training in architecture is evident in the structure of the many of the jackets in particular Babylon Cartel creates (one of which, an oversized camouflage jacket, has been seen on none other than singer and fashion lover Rhianna) and the images he creates.
    Photographs used to promote the clothing line make strong statements about where Babylon Cartel is going. Their ability to create social commentary in an appealing and sometimes dark but sensitive way is self reflective in ways only a collective can develop, by keeping the members grounded while encouraging each other’s success.

    The most recent photo being used to promote their new line of jackets shows a grainy image of a group of three young black men, members of the Babylon Cartel, on a security camera, leaving a convenience store. Emblazoned on the back of each jacket are two large lowercase intertwined letters, b and c, within a large circle. Almost like a bull’s eye on the back of each young man, a symbol of the violence Lee and his colleagues have seen and experienced and their work transforming that difficult life into art.

    At the end of the interview back stage Lee reflected on being back in Philadelphia and the shooting that happened just days earlier. For him, that violence felt very close, and he reflected on how his ability to pursue different styles of artistic expression forged the most defining path in his life so far.

    “Art is a direct projection of your surroundings, environment, and upbringing. I believe that even the most profound and developed idea can manifest in some of the most hostile environments. Especially the hood. Poverty stricken areas always have a handful of kids who develop skills and talents that they practice to escape the harsh realities of everyday life. The chances of these kids making it to share their talents with the world is cut short because many of their neighborhoods are already programmed for them to fail. Arts programs, more leaders willing to get their hands dirty, it’s bigger than us, art is important.”

    Share this:

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
    July 21, 2017

  • Terrance Williams safe for now, but D.A. falls short of ‘zealous, ethical and effective’ standards

    This essay first appeared September 28, 2012 on ESSAYWORKS at WHYY NEWSWORKS

    This morning, Friday Sept. 28, 2012, the life of Terrance Williams was temporarily spared the execution scheduled for him just days from now. He is also scheduled to have another hearing with the Pennsylvania pardons board.

    It was a day of joy in a courtroom that for weeks was gradually packed with all manner of people interested in the case. Williams’  family and childhood friends were there since the first of the post-conviction relief act hearings began. Some of them broke out in applause and praise to God — silenced by court officers when Judge Sarmina read that the stay would be granted and that Williams was entitled to a new penalty phase.

    Williams is one of over 200 people on Pennsylvania’s death row and almost half of those people have come from Philadelphia. Of the 95 people on death row that have come from Philadelphia courts, approximately 18 of those cases were tried and sentenced to death in a period from 1983 until 1987, according to an execution list maintained by the state. (See document below.) This four-year period has come under great scrutiny because of issues such as the McMahon tapes, an instructional video made in 1986 by senior prosecutor at the time in the Philadelphia district attorney’s office Jack McMahon on excluding “young blacks” from juries.

    The verdict in the Williams hearing confirmed that the original prosecutor willfully withheld and suppressed important information relevant to the initial Williams case in the late 1980s, continuing the tragic saga of justice deferred in Philadelphia.

    “The Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office provides a voice for victims of crime and protects the community through zealous, ethical and effective investigations and prosecutions.” That is the statement on the current district attorney’s office website. Yet through the whole of these hearings and proceedings involving Williams’ life, the disturbing process of obtaining a capital conviction in Philadelphia becomes clear.

    It is the job of the district attorney’s office to conduct zealous, ethical and effective investigations, but in the Williams case, they have fallen short. In closing arguments, the federal prosecutor referred to Williams as a teenaged prostitute and brushed off allegations of Norwood as a sexual predator because the exact age of the “young boys” was not clear. In her verdict, Judge Sarmina reminded the court that engaging in sexual acts with teenagers exclusively is ephebophilia.

    The prosecutor in the original case had a statement from a reverend at St. Luke’s church, where Norwood volunteered, noting an issue with Norwood sexually propositioning a 17-year-old parishioner. That evidence was suppressed, as was the original statement of Mamie Norwood, the widow of the victim, who recently asked that Williams be granted clemency.

    This is all in opposition to what the district attorney’s office stands for. They are to protect us. They are to be the example of ethics in our communities. For weeks, I sat at hearings, and the fight over Terrance Williams was palpable every moment. Must we fight for so many lives in this way?

    Something is wrong with the capital punishment system in Pennsylvania, and our state is finally starting to see this. There are some in state government working to fix this problem, such as Senators Daylin Leach and Stewart Greenleaf, who on behalf of the bipartisan task force and advisory committee studying the death penalty in Pennsylvania, released a letter requesting “no execution be carried out in the Commonwealth” until the study is completed in December 2013. That we may be sure we are doing the right thing by proceeding with state executions; can we not wait a year until we are sure it is within the law and ethics of our state to do so?

    Unfortunately it seems as if the Philadelphia D.A.’s office and Gov. Tom Corbett are not able to wait. Seth Williams issued a statement on the verdict and appealed Terrance Williams’ stay of execution within hours, and Corbett signed another execution warrant for a York County man on Sept. 12.

    Share this:

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
    July 21, 2017

  • Arguments about food safety rules should consider the homeless people being served

    This essay first appeared FEBRUARY 21, 2012 on ESSAYWORKS at WHYY NEWSWORKS

     

    A recommendation by the Philadelphia Board of Health to regulate outdoor feedinghas garnered a lot of attention lately.

    The organization Food Not Bombs has been particularly vocal about these kinds of regulations nationally, as they distribute food to thousands of homeless people in American cities every year. In June 2011, members of the group were jailed in Orlando, Fla., after violating a recently passed city ordinance requiring permits for distributing free food to large groups.

    Many voices are chiming in on these proposed laws: city officials, food distribution volunteers — and there will even be a waiting period to vote on the Philadelphia ordinance so citizens can submit comments about it online. But what about the people who eat the food from free distributions? What is their take on enacting such laws?

    An article in the UK’s Daily Mail on the arrests in Orlando last June was accompanied by photos of actual food distributions. One picture shows five teenagers handling food without gloves. In another picture, groups of volunteers, all without gloves, touch their hair, while at their feet are pots of food and reams of Styrofoam cups.

    On the Food Not Bombs blog, in a Feb. 13 post requesting donations to continue their fight against food distribution ordinances, one of the organization’s founders quoted Daytona Beach activist Kathy Mitro: “There is no right way to give out food,” she proclaimed in all caps. “There is only giving out all the food you can.”

    Doyle Parker, who has been transient for the past few years since losing his house during a divorce, came to Philadelphia a few weeks ago. He’s eaten food given out for free in this city and others, and he has seen many of these laws popping up recently.

    “You have to ask yourself, why now?” he said. “Are they concerned about health issues? Taking food from the street is akin to caveat emptor —” Doyle stopped himself suddenly mid-sentence and his expression turned briefly sullen. “Kind of.”

    While Doyle doesn’t actually purchase the food given out, there is that “buyers beware” feeling amongst those who need to take handouts. Doyle, along with every other person I spoke with, has received food past the expiration date at some point during a free food distribution. To have to consider eating food that could be spoiled and make you ill (becoming dehydrated from stomach issues can be fatal for any person), or eating nothing at all, is not a decision any person should have to make.

    Food Not Bombs has been challenging laws for the regulation of food distribution in Orlando and Philadelphia. The proposed Philadelphia city ordinance and the one enacted in Orlando have some very important differences:

    • The Orlando ordinance does not mention anything about safe food handling, but the proposed Philadelphia ordinance contains five separate regulations for safe handling.
    • Orlando requires payments for permits and mandates punishments for violations. Philadelphia’s proposal does not mandate that violations would result in arrests or fines.
    • The Philadelphia ordinance would provide free trainings for volunteers, and does not exclude participation by anyone. Such trainings might be used as tools by these hard-working volunteers to offer to the people they serve as well as to educate themselves further in their work.
    • Although, in Philadelphia, menus would have to be submitted as early as a year in advance with no mention of alternatives or supplementing reports for unexpected menu changes.

    Doyle continued to express concern over the proposed regulations scaring off possible volunteers, bringing all distributions to a stop. Another man, who asked only to be named as Theodore, offered a different perspective. He sat with us at our table at the Free Library of Philadelphia’s Central Branch at 19th and Vine Streets, directly across the street from some of the most popular food distribution spots.

    “I don’t think it [food distribution] would stop,” Theodore countered. “[The new rules] should encourage it ,because it would keep things safe.”

    Theodore has been without a home in Philadelphia for as long as five years. The evening we spoke he was at the library to warm up on his way to a place to stay the night. He had to leave at exactly 8 p.m., and he told me about some appointments he had the next day.

    “I want to just say,” he started as he stood up to leave, moving a heavy, loud, wooden chair in an area between the art and literature sections on the second floor, “not many people ask us questions. Some people don’t even talk to us.”

    Some people — like the ones who seek to regulate the lives of people like Doyle and Theodore through law, and even sometimes, while serving them food.

    Poet Aja Beech is a Creative Connector and a board member of Pennsylvanians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty. She uses her poetry to mobilize a network of activists aiming to stop capital punishment.

    Share this:

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
    July 21, 2017
    food safety, Homeless, Philadelphia

  • Leeway Art and Change Grant Recipient

    Photo by Sean Bolton

    2010 Art and Change Grant – $2,500

    • Neighborhood: Kensington
    • Change Partner: Pennsylvanians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty
    • Discipline: Literary Arts
    • Social Change / Intent: Militarization / Criminalization / Incarceration

    Aja will create and publish a chapbook of poetry to bring awareness to the atrocities caused by the death penalty in Pennsylvania. The book will be a compilation of her poetry and writings, writings by family members of murder victims and current or exonerated death row prisoners from and/or living in the Philadelphia area. After assisting a loved one who was in prison on exaggerated charges, Aja was moved to want to help those that had no one advocating for them. Her intention in creating this compilation is to make a powerful artistic statement that could potentially encourage those that read it to consider whether the death penalty truly serves the needs of victims or the community at large. The book will be distributed free of charge.

    Share this:

    • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
    • Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
    Like Loading…
    July 20, 2017
    Aja Beech, Art and Change Grant, Leeway Foundation

Previous Page

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

 

Loading Comments...
 

    • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Aja Beech
      • Join 37 other subscribers
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • Aja Beech
      • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Report this content
      • View site in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar
    %d